Publication

Abstract : The main goal of this chapter is to look at how multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models based on Geographic Information Systems (GIS) can be used correctly and incorrectly in geomorphology. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) make collecting, analyzing, and displaying spatial data easier. This makes them an essential tool for studying geomorphic phenomena and how landforms change over time. When combining MCDM models with geomorphology, many criteria and factors can be evaluated simultaneously. This helps people make better decisions and understand how landscapes change over time. Nevertheless, properly utilizing GIS-based Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) models may result in better results and correct decision-making. Because collecting data on geomorphic processes is complex and can lead to mistakes, one of the biggest problems is making sure that the data that is put in is accurate and of good quality. The results from Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) models may not be as reliable if they are based on incomplete datasets. Moreover, due to the intricate nature of these models, stakeholders may express a need to elucidate the fundamental decision-making procedure. Geomorphologists are still having trouble finding the best balance between making models that are both complicated and easy to understand. We must use multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models based on geographic information systems (GIS) that are creative and responsible for addressing these problems. This chapter looks at practical strategies and possible solutions, allowing us to use these models in geomorphological research and make decisions in the best way possible. Additionally, it underscores the necessity for continued investigation and advancement within this dynamic domain.