Publications

Abstract : BACKGROUND The diagnosis of thyroid malignancies continues to remain a challenge, due to lack of specificity with various modalities, and intrinsic variability with clinical examination. Although histopathological diagnosis is confirmatory, there is a need for pre-surgical assessment and confirmation, which will prove to be useful in decision making regarding the course of management. The present study was carried out to evaluate the validity of various modalities for detection of thyroid malignancies. METHODS This cross-sectional study was carried out among 40 patients who presented to the outpatient clinic with thyroid nodules. All the participants were evaluated by ultrasound, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and sestamibi scintigraphy. All the participants were taken up for surgery and the resected specimen was sent for histopathology for confirmatory diagnosis. RESULTS Ultrasound and FNAC detected malignancy in 25 % of the participants, while sestamibi scintigraphy detected malignancy in 30 % of the participants. Based on histopathology, the gold standard confirmatory test, malignancy was detected in 35 % of the participants. It was observed that the sensitivity was highest for FNAC (75 %) followed by TC methoxyisobutylisonitrile (TC MIBI) (50 %). Specificity was highest for FNAC (95 %) followed by ultrasound (88 %) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS FNAC has the highest sensitivity and specificity while ultrasound and sestamibi have comparable specificity. There is a high probability of malignancy when the delayed image in sestamibi scintigraphy shows retention. MIBI may prove to be useful in differentiating benign and malignant follicular lesions