Publication

Abstract : Objectives: With a substantial number of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) experiencing disease relapse, the quest for more sensitive methods to assess deeper responses indicative of cure continues. Methods: In this prospective analysis of 170 patients with MM at day 100 after autologous stem cell transplant, we evaluated the predictive value of conventional response, measurable residual disease (MRDTOTAL: the aberrant percentage of plasma cells [PC%] among total bone marrow cells), and neoplastic plasma cell index scores (NPCI: the aberrant PC% of total PCs). Results: Significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were observed with deepening conventional response. Conventional response-based stratification within the MRD-positive and MRD-negative subgroups showed a significantly higher PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.11; P < .005) and OS (HR, 3.08; P = .01) in the conventional response-positive/MRD-positive group compared with the conventional response-negative/MRD-positive group. Using K-adaptive partitioning to find the optimum threshold for MRD, patients achieving less than 0.001% MRDTOTAL had superior PFS (MRDTOTAL 0.001% to <0.1%: HR, 6.66, P < .005; MRDTOTAL ≥0.1%: HR, 11.52, P < .005) and OS (MRDTOTAL 0.001% to <0.1%: HR, 5.3, P < .05; MRDTOTAL ≥0.1%: HR = 9.21, P < .005). The C index and Akaike information criterion metrics demonstrated the superior performance of the NPCI compared with MRDTOTAL in predicting treatment outcome. Conclusions: Progressive deepening of response, conventional as well as MRD, correlates with superior survival outcomes. The NPCI proved to be a superior determinant of survival and can be explored as a better statistic than MRD.